Immorality abortion essays
Fetuses have no awareness of their futures whatsoever, and this is one important difference between their futures and our futures. Killing human beings is often deeply wrong, so is abortion wrong?
Accordingly, there are reasons to adopt a convention that murders equally wrong. It seems however that moral conflicts on issue mainly arise when discussing induced abortions. If it did, the pregnant woman is at the very least an accessory, and more likely a conspirator.
Norcross, A. The FLO account of the wrongness of killing also explains why this is so.
Why abortion is wrong
Shirley, E. They are at once together and separate. In the FLO argument potentiality is not used in order to bridge the gap between adults and fetuses as is done in the argument in the above paragraph. A correct theory of the wrongness of killing should have these features. The FLO account provides an explanation of the wrongness of killing that is sufficient to account for the serious presumptive wrongness of killing. Notes 1 Unless we are doing veterinary ethics and are thinking about aborting feline or canine or other non-human fetuses. Some of life's values for the elderly are best appreciated by the elderly. A major respect in which the FLO account is superior to accounts that appeal to the concept of person is the explanation the FLO account provides of the wrongness of killing infants. In this case, the author starts by illustrating why killing an ordinary adult is morally wrong, and tries to apply same reasons to the case of abortion. Human Persons? Morality and law are often connected to one another because the two sometimes overlap. There are replies to the four most important objections to the FLO argument for the immorality of abortion. Fetuses who are aborted, of course, will not. However, something can be in someone's interest without that individual being capable of caring about it, or about anything. For example, Kant argued that, although we do not have direct duties to animals, we "must practice kindness towards animals, for he who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men" Kant, , p.
On the other hand, one might argue that the futures of non-human animals are not sufficiently like ours for the FLO account to entail that it is wrong to kill them. This meant that there was no longer any room for God in an enlightened and civilized society.
But this is hardly a general right to abortion.
based on 81 review